7 February 2025 | 9 minute read
Of course, the inescapable reality is that nobody knows and as John Kenneth Galbraith said many years ago: “the only function of economic forecasting is to make astrology look respectable”.
I appreciate this isn’t especially satisfactory, as investors would like their financial advisers to offer at least some view of the future. Indeed, several years ago, I was taken to task at an event for not offering a prediction for where the S&P 500 would finish at the end of year. My explanation that it was pure folly to guess where the index would be after 12 months wasn’t appreciated.
If we can’t know the future, how should we invest our capital? Whilst we must embrace a degree of uncertainty, we can learn a lot from history and past economic cycles. We can also endeavour to see the present more clearly and try not to fall victim to behavioural biases.
Our analysis of past economic and market cycles certainly supported our positive stance last year, with evidence of growing corporate earnings and moderating inflation supporting our thesis during the year.
As we enter 2025, not too much has changed in this view. Whilst inflation is still a concern, it’s not at a level that has proved problematic for equity market valuation in the past, and corporate earnings continue to grow.
The greater challenge this year though is valuation, as markets became more expensive last year, with the forward earnings yield for the world equity market declining from circa 6% to 5.5%.
While there may be a debate over the sustainability of the corporate margins that underpin these earnings, the earnings yield is a reasonable way to think about potential after-inflation returns from the equity market, over the long term.
With government bond yields now between 2.5% and 5% across the developed world, there’s a valid debate as to whether we are getting paid a sufficient premium to invest in equities today. Of course, we should subtract inflation from these bond yields to draw a true comparison, but for the first time in many years it seems possible to deliver acceptable returns from a bond portfolio.
Whilst we have little doubt that a well-constructed equity portfolio will deliver significantly superior long-term returns, investors who wish to minimise portfolio volatility certainly have more options today.
Despite this, our guidance is to remain overweight equities in portfolios relative to a neutral position. This may change as the year progresses but the indicators we use as part of our investment process continue to support this position.
This implies a positive view on the economy, as we need to see earnings growth to support equity market gains.
In the absence of earnings growth, higher markets would require higher valuations, which may push the market to an unsustainably high level. This, of course, could happen, and it has certainly happened in the past, with the late 1990s being the most extreme example.
The late 1990s is an interesting period to reflect on now, as the market at the time was driven by a speculative fervour over new technology, which draws certain parallels to today’s excitement over artificial intelligence (AI).
Indeed, if we look at market returns last year, it’s evident that 2024 was a very momentum-driven market, and we should be wary when investors are investing in assets based on momentum. However, last year winners were supported by strong earnings growth and, thus, while valuations have increased it looks reasonably rational to us.
The 1990s analogy does make us wonder whether it could all get silly at some point. To give you a sense of this, an index that tracks some of today’s perceived AI winners trades on approximately 1.3 times the market’s valuation multiple, whereas in the late 1990s, the perceived winners traded on nearly five times the market’s multiple – now that was crazy.
Thus far, aside from pockets of madness in certain in ‘things’ like memecoins, market valuations look rational, but if narratives truly take hold that could change, presenting challenges to conservative firms like us. How we might respond if this should happen is something we’re debating.
We’re also very open to the idea that corporate earnings could be very strong for a period, should the benefits of AI flow through company revenue and margins, which we’ve discussed before when extoling the virtues of companies with data advantages. Such a scenario would go some way to overcoming today’s valuation challenge.
All this really is to say that we can see, and are open to, several outcomes over the coming years.
Indeed, within the last week, we’ve seen the market swing from being very positive on the capital expenditure plans of big tech to worrying whether they’re spending too much and that AI models will be commoditised. This follows the release of a new potentially more efficient AI model from the Chinese company DeepSeek.
Geopolitical risk has also come to the fore in recent days, following the imposition and subsequent pausing of tariffs by the U.S. administration. No doubt trade relations will be an ongoing source of volatility throughout the year.
These wild swings remind us of the value of diversification and the hubris of prediction.
Looking forward, it’s certainly the case that equity valuations are higher today and we’ve more alternatives when building portfolios. This would suggest more caution and diversification. However, we can also envisage better-than-expected outcomes that result in a continuation of equity market outperformance.
Either way, we look forward to another interesting year and we thank you for the continued trust you place in us.
As ever, if you would like to discuss our views further, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Ian Quigley
T: +353 1 2600080
E: ian.quigley@brewin.ie
Disclaimer
Brewin Dolphin Wealth Management Limited trading as RBC Brewin Dolphin is regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland. For UK clients only: RBC Brewin Dolphin is deemed authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. The nature and extent of consumer protections may differ from those for firms based in the UK. Details of the Financial Services Contracts Regime, which allows EEA-based firms to operate in the UK for a limited period to carry on activities which are necessary for the performance of pre-existing contracts, are available on the Financial Conduct Authority’s website. Registered office: Number One Ballsbridge, Building 1, Shelbourne Road, Dublin 4, D04 FP65. Registered in Dublin, Ireland No. 235126
This publication should be regarded as being for information only and should not be considered as an offer or solicitation to sell, buy or subscribe to any financial instruments, securities or any derivative instrument, or any other rights pertaining thereto (together, ‘investments’). This publication is classified as a ‘marketing communication’ in accordance with the European Union (Markets in Financial Instruments) Regulations 2017. This means that (a) it has not been prepared in accordance with the legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and (b) it is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research. RBC Brewin Dolphin does not express any opinion as to the present or future value or price of any investments referred to in this publication. This publication may not be reproduced without the consent of RBC Brewin Dolphin.
The information contained in this publication has been compiled from sources believed to be reliable, but, neither RBC Brewin Dolphin, nor any of its directors, officers, or employees accept liability for any loss arising from the use hereof or makes any representations as to its accuracy and completeness. The information contained in this publication is valid as at the date of this publication. This information is subject to change without notice, its accuracy is not guaranteed, it may be incomplete or condensed and it may not contain all material information concerning the matters discussed herein.
This publication does not constitute investment advice and has been prepared without regard to individual financial circumstances, objectives or particular needs of recipients. Readers should seek their own financial, tax, legal, regulatory and other advice regarding the appropriateness or otherwise of investing in any investments or pursuing any investment strategies.
An investment in any of the investments discussed in this publication may result in some or all of the money invested being lost. Past performance is not a reliable guide to future performance. To the extent that this publication is deemed to contain any forecasts as to the performance of any investments, the reader is warned that forecasts are not a reliable indicator of future performance. The value of any investments can fall as well as rise. Foreign currency denominated investments are subject to fluctuations in exchange rates that may have a positive or adverse effect on the value, price or income of such investments. Certain transactions, including those involving futures, options and other derivative instruments, can give rise to substantial risk and are not suitable for all investors.
RBC Brewin Dolphin (or its directors, officers or employees) may to the extent permitted by law, own or have a position in the investments (including derivative instruments or any other rights pertaining thereto) of any issuer or related company referred to herein, and may add to or dispose of any such position or may make a market or act as a principal in any transaction in such investments or financial transactions.
RBC Brewin Dolphin’s conflicts of interest policy is available at https://www.brewin.ie/conflicts-policy-summary.